Politics

Investigation into home secretary’s handling of speeding offence ‘not necessary’

Suella Braverman is to remain in her post as home secretary after the prime minister said “further investigation is not necessary” into her handling of a speeding offence.

In his letter to the home secretary, the prime minister said he had consulted with his independent ethics adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, who advised that “on this occasion further investigation is not necessary and I have accepted that advice”.

Mr Sunak had been facing pressure to take action against Ms Braverman after the Sunday Times reported that she allegedly asked civil servants to arrange a private one-to-one course after she was caught speeding last summer – a move critics said could amount to a breach of the ministerial code.

But Mr Sunak said that after receiving a letter from Ms Braverman – in which she apologised for causing “distraction” – “my decision is that these matters do not amount to a breach of the ministerial code”.

In the exchange of letters, the home secretary admitted that “if faced with a similar situation again, I would have chosen a different course of action”.

She said she had “at all times been truthful and transparent, and taken decisions guided by what I believed was right and appropriate given my office, not by any personal motivation”.

The Sunday Times reported that instead of signing up for an in-person speed awareness course with other motorists, or completing one online that would show her name and face to other participants, Ms Braverman allegedly asked civil servants to arrange a private one-to-one course.

More on Conservatives

When the civil servants refused, she reportedly sought help from a political aide, who requested for the course organiser to provide a private session, or allow her to use an alias or turn her camera off.

When the course provider refused, Ms Braverman opted to take the three points on her licence, the paper reported.

Ms Braverman said she “sought to explore whether bespoke arrangements were possible” due to her “personal circumstances” and the security she receives as a government minister.

“I recognise how some people have construed this as me seeking to avoid sanction – at no point was that the intention or outcome,” she said.

“Nonetheless, given the fundamental importance of integrity in public life, I deeply regret that my actions may have given rise to that perception, and I apologise for the distraction this has caused.”

Mr Sunak immediately came under criticism for his decision, which the Liberal Democrats branded a “cowardly cop-out”.

The party’s chief whip, Wendy Chamberlain, said “with every scandal, we see the prime minister dither, delay and flip-flop – never taking decisive action”.

“This is not the leadership the country needs during such a severe cost-of-living crisis. Sunak is too weak to even order an investigation, let alone sack his home secretary.

“Sunak had the chance to do the right thing but instead he’s once again chosen to be ruled by his own hardline backbenchers. He may be in office but he is barely in power.”

Articles You May Like

Baidu says its ChatGPT-like Ernie bot exceeds 200 million users
Jeremy Kyle expected to give evidence at inquest into death of man who died after his TV show
Met Police chief to meet home secretary after calls for him to quit over antisemitism row
Dozens arrested and thousands contacted after scammer site taken offline
Blackstone tunes up £1.2bn bid for Blondie music owner Hipgnosis